Simon Duquennoy <[email protected]> wrote: > I feel we need to make sure any valid RH3 can be compressed with 6LoRH. This > way, RPL implementations do not need to be aware of 6LoRH.
I'm sensitive to your need, but I'm not sure it's worthwhile. What kind of awareness do you feel is required? There needs to be some communication of what are the interesting prefixes. I don't see this as a problem. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
