Simon Duquennoy <[email protected]> wrote: > Not really. It was rather my view of the architecture that differs a > bit from what you describe in your previous mail.
okay.
> For me RPL produces the RH3 and then passes the packet down the stack
> for compression. Or for incoming packets, first there is
> decompression, then the IPv6 packet with its headers and extension
> headers are passed up to RPL etc. If find it odd to force upper layers
> to work on 6lowpan compressed formats.
RPL is the thing in RFC6550, a routing protocol, that runs over ICMP ND
messages.
I think the thing you are describing is the IPv6 stack, and you don't like
that the IPv6 stack has to interact with the link adaptation layer.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
