Hi Pascal,
Thanks a lot for keeping the discussion topics open. I am absolutely
fine with your
suggestion of having the draft as it is for the plugtest.
Anand
On Saturday 23 January 2016 05:48 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> Dear all: > > > > I uploaded the changes made after the discussions
on the 6lo ML and conformed at the interim Friday. > > There are 2
discussions left open, for a better compression of the RH when the
boundary is not a power of 2 (Simon) and whether we should refrain from
consuming the addresses of the RH as we go (Simon and Anand). For both,
there is an active ticket at 6lo: > > > > #14: More optimal compression
of 6LoRH > > #11: RH3 6LoRH not recoverable > > > > For the plugtest,
though, I suggest we live with what we have,
draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt and
draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-01.txt. > > > > Note: With this spec an
example of Downward Packet In Non-Storing Mode will be: > > > >
+-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ... -+-+-+-+-+ ... +-...
> > |11110001 |RH3-6LoRH | RPI-6LoRH | IP-in-IP | NH=1 |11110CPP| UDP |
UDP > > |Page 1 |Type1 S=2 | | 6LoRH | IPHC | UDP |
hdr |load > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ...
-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-... > > <-8bytes->
<- RFC 6282 -> > >
No RPL artifact > > > > Figure 20: Example Compressed
Packet with RH3. > > > > Are we OK? > > > > Pascal > > > > -----Original
Message----- > > From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: samedi 23 janvier 2016 13:07
> > To: Robert Cragie <[email protected]>; Pascal Thubert
(pthubert) <[email protected]>; Dr. Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>;
Laurent Toutain <[email protected]>; Carsten Bormann
<[email protected]>; Laurent Toutain <[email protected]> >
> Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt > > > > > > A new version of I-D,
draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt > > has been successfully
submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the IETF repository. > > > >
Name: draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch > >
Revision: 04 > > Title: 6LoWPAN Routing
Header > > Document date: 2016-01-23 > > Group: 6lo > >
Pages: 31 > > URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt
> > Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch/ > >
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04 > >
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04 > >
> > Abstract: > > This specification introduces a new 6LoWPAN
dispatch type for use in > > 6LoWPAN Route-Over topologies, that
initially covers the needs of RPL > > (RFC6550) data packets
compression. Using this dispatch type, this > > specification
defines a method to compress RPL Option (RFC6553) > > information and
Routing Header type 3 (RFC6554), an efficient IP-in- > > IP technique
and is extensible for more applications. > > > > > > > > > > Please note
that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until
the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > > >
The IETF Secretariat > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for
viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be
clean. > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch
mailing list > [email protected] >
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
