I opened 4, Simon : ) But I consider 2 of them solved. Please let me know If you think differently...
Cheers, Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Simon Duquennoy > Sent: dimanche 24 janvier 2016 17:38 > To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for > draft-ietf- > 6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt > > Thanks Pascal for opening the issues, and I agree we stick to the current > draft for the plugtest. > /Simon > > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear all: > > > > > > > > I uploaded the changes made after the discussions on the 6lo ML and > > conformed at the interim Friday. > > > > There are 2 discussions left open, for a better compression of the RH > > when the boundary is not a power of 2 (Simon) and whether we should > > refrain from consuming the addresses of the RH as we go (Simon and > > Anand). For both, there is an active ticket at 6lo: > > > > > > > > #14: More optimal compression of 6LoRH > > > > #11: RH3 6LoRH not recoverable > > > > > > > > For the plugtest, though, I suggest we live with what we have, > > draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt and > > draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-01.txt. > > > > > > > > Note: With this spec an example of Downward Packet In Non-Storing > > Mode will > > be: > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ... -+-+-+-+-+ ... +-... > > > > |11110001 |RH3-6LoRH | RPI-6LoRH | IP-in-IP | NH=1 |11110CPP| UDP | > > |UDP > > > > |Page 1 |Type1 S=2 | | 6LoRH | IPHC | UDP | hdr |load > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ... -+-+-+-+-+ ... +-... > > > > <-8bytes-> <- RFC 6282 -> > > > > No RPL artifact > > > > > > > > Figure 20: Example Compressed Packet with RH3. > > > > > > > > Are we OK? > > > > > > > > Pascal > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: samedi 23 janvier 2016 13:07 > > > > To: Robert Cragie <[email protected]>; Pascal Thubert > > (pthubert) <[email protected]>; Dr. Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>; > > Laurent Toutain <[email protected]>; Carsten > Bormann > > <[email protected]>; Laurent Toutain <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: New Version Notification for > > draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt > > > > has been successfully submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the > > IETF repository. > > > > > > > > Name: draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch > > > > Revision: 04 > > > > Title: 6LoWPAN Routing Header > > > > Document date: 2016-01-23 > > > > Group: 6lo > > > > Pages: 31 > > > > URL: > > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-0 > > 4.txt > > > > Status: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch/ > > > > Htmlized: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04 > > > > Diff: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04 > > > > > > > > Abstract: > > > > This specification introduces a new 6LoWPAN dispatch type for use > > in > > > > 6LoWPAN Route-Over topologies, that initially covers the needs of > > RPL > > > > (RFC6550) data packets compression. Using this dispatch type, this > > > > specification defines a method to compress RPL Option (RFC6553) > > > > information and Routing Header type 3 (RFC6554), an efficient > > IP-in- > > > > IP technique and is extensible for more applications. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org. > > > > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > 6tisch mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
