Dear all:

During the 6TiSCH plugtest we experimented successfully  with the 6LoRH draf 
but found one limitation that is inherent to the stateless compression in RFC 
6282.

The way we designed it, stateless compression only works for link local 
addresses. But in the case at hand, we usually have an IP in IP encapsulation 
and it would make a lot of sense that the prefix is inherited from the outer IP.

So we produced this new and very short proposed update to RFC 6282.

Wha od you think?

Pascal


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: mercredi 10 février 2016 15:38
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]>; Simon Duquennoy 
<[email protected]>; Xavier Vilajosana <[email protected]>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-6lo-inner-compression-00.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-thubert-6lo-inner-compression-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the IETF 
repository.

Name:           draft-thubert-6lo-inner-compression
Revision:       00
Title:          6LoWPAN Inner Compression
Document date:  2016-02-10
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          8
URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-thubert-6lo-inner-compression-00.txt
Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thubert-6lo-inner-compression/
Htmlized:       
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6lo-inner-compression-00


Abstract:
   This specification modifies 6LoWPAN stateless address compression to
   enable the compression by 6LOWPAN_IPHC of non Link-Local addresses in
   an IP header when a reference address can be found in an
   encapsulation.  .

                                                                                
  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission 
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to