That’s what the “logically” means, Thomas.

We use that trick when we refer to data structures or any internal that we 
cannot enforce but is useful to describe the operation; like a logical data 
structure that contains blah and blah.

So I ‘d use either the “may be” (lowercase, there is no uppercase in archie) or 
the “logically”.

Which one seems better ?

Pascal

From: Thomas Watteyne [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: lundi 6 juin 2016 14:49
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [6tisch] proposed text to describe SF and 6P in archie

Pascal,

Makes sense. We could add a MAY there, what about:

“
   The SF MAY logically be divided in a bandwidth adaptation logic that is not 
aware
   of the particular technology that is used to obtain and release bandwidth,
   and an underlying service sublayer that maps those needs in the actual
   technology, which means mapping the bandwidth onto cells in the case of TSCH.
“

Thomas

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello Thomas:

I want to convey that the upper piece operates on a logical bandwidth, whereas 
the lower actuates bandwidth on cells.

Is this more clear:
“
   The SF is logically divided in a bandwidth adaptation logic that is not aware
   of the particular technology that is used to obtain and release bandwidth,
   and an underlying service sublayer that maps those needs in the actual
   technology, which means mapping the bandwidth onto cells in the case of TSCH.
“
?

Pascal

From: Thomas Watteyne 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: vendredi 3 juin 2016 20:42
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] proposed text to describe SF and 6P in archie

Pascal,

Some typos and suggestions below.

4.2.2.  Scheduling Functions and the 6P Protocol (6P)

   In the case of soft cells, the cell management entity that controls
   the dynamic attribution of cells to adapt to the dynamics of variable
   rate flows is called Scheduling Function (SF).  There may be
   multiple SFs, each implementing a different policy to adapt to varying
   network traffic.  The 6TiSCH 6top Scheduling Function Zero (SF0)
   [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-sf0] provides a simple scheduling function that
   can be used by default by devices that support dynamic scheduling of
   soft cells.

   The SF is logically divided in an abstract bandwidth adaptation policy
   which is abstract to the particular technology used to obtain and
   release bandwidth,
TW> I don't understand the previous sentence
   and a underlying service sublayer which identifies the
   appropriate TSCH cells to use.

    +------------------------+          +------------------------+
    |  Scheduling Function   |          |  Scheduling Function   |
    |  Bandwidth adaptation  |          |  Bandwidth adaptation  |
    +------------------------+          +------------------------+
    |  Scheduling Function   |          |  Scheduling Function   |
    |   TSCH cell mapping    |          |   TSCH cell mapping    |
    +------------------------+          +------------------------+
    | 6top cells negotiation | <- 6P -> | 6top cells negotiation |
    +------------------------+          +------------------------+


                       Figure 6: SF/6P stack in 6top

   The SF relies on the 6top Protocol (6P)
   [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol] to negotiate the cells between
   neighbor nodes.  It
   may be for instance that a node wants to use a particular time slot
   that is free in its schedule, but which is already in use by
   its neighbor.  The 6P protocol enables the neighbor nodes to find
   an agreement on which cells to use.


On Friday, June 3, 2016, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear all:

As discussed at the last Interim, please find proposed text in the 6TiSCH 
architecture below.

What do you think?

Pascal

4.2.2.  Scheduling Functions and the 6P protocol

   In the case of soft cells, the cell management entity that controls
   the dynamic attribution of cells to adapt to the dynamics of variable
   rate flows is called a Scheduling Function (SF).  There may be
   multiple SFs with more or less aggressive reaction to the dynamics of
   the network.  The 6TiSCH 6top Scheduling Function Zero (SF0)
   [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-sf0] provides a simple scheduling function that
   can be used by default by devices that support dynamic scheduling of
   soft cells.

   The SF is logically divided in an abstract bandwidth adaptation logic
   that is abstract to the particular technology used to obtain and
   release bandwidth, and a underlying service sublayer that maps those
   needs in the actual technology, which means identifying the
   appropriate cells in the context of TSCH.

    +------------------------+          +------------------------+
    |  Scheduling Function   |          |  Scheduling Function   |
    |  Bandwidth adaptation  |          |  Bandwidth adaptation  |
    +------------------------+          +------------------------+
    |  Scheduling Function   |          |  Scheduling Function   |
    | TSCH mapping to cells  |          | TSCH mapping to cells  |
    +------------------------+          +------------------------+
    | 6top cells negotiation | <- 6P -> | 6top cells negotiation |
    +------------------------+          +------------------------+


                       Figure 6: SF/6P stack in 6top

   The SF relies on 6top services that implement the 6top Protocol (6P)
   [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol] to negotiate the precise cells that
   will be allocated or freed based on the schedules of the peer.  It
   may be for instance that a peer wants to use a particular time slot
   that is free in its schedule, but that timeslot is already in use by
   the other peer for a communication with a third party on a different
   cell.  The 6P protocol enables the peers to find an agreement in a
   transactional manner that ensures the final consistency of the nodes
   state.

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch


--
_______________________________________

Thomas Watteyne, PhD
Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech
Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH

www.thomaswatteyne.com<http://www.thomaswatteyne.com>
_______________________________________




--
_______________________________________

Thomas Watteyne, PhD
Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech
Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH

www.thomaswatteyne.com<http://www.thomaswatteyne.com>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to