Hi Thomas,
Could we say something to the effect that, if SF0 realizes connection to a particular neighbor is no longer needed (for example a change in parent by the routing protocol) SF0 MAY send CLEAR requests to neighbor to speed up the cleanup process of the cells with that neighbors?
I guess so. I would say it's a use-case description for CLEAR. To me, it seems the 6P draft is a right place to add something as you suggested. In that sense, "SF0" in the text above could be replaced with "SF", anonymous one: If a SF realizes connection to a particular neighbor is no longer needed (for example a change in parent by the routing protocol), the SF MAY send CLEAR requests to the neighbor to speed up the cleanup process of the cells with that neighbors. # Honestly, I'm not sure what "with that neighbors" suggested... By the way, the API thing I mentioned is a hypothetical scenario; I respect the "minimal" nature of SF0. :-) Best, Yatch _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
