I like the idea! On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) < [email protected]> wrote:
> Makes sense to me J > > > > *From:* 6tisch [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Xavi > Vilajosana Guillen > *Sent:* mercredi 19 juillet 2017 19:23 > *To:* tisch <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [6tisch] new command for 6P > > > > Dear all, > > > > I would like to propose a new command to be used to the 6P Protocol. The > command may be used to configure SF or exchange information between the SF > of the communicating nodes. The command can be named SIGNAL and 6P will not > define the content but only the operation and encapsulation. The content > will be defined by the different SFs as an IE. > > > > I think that a message like this brings flexibility to SFs to implement > configuration operations. > > > > what do you think? > > regards, > > Xavi > > > > -- > > *Dr. Xavier Vilajosana* > Wireless Networks Lab > > *Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3) Professor* > (+34) 646 633 681 <+34%20646%2063%2036%2081> > [email protected] <[email protected]> > http://xvilajosana.org > http://wine.rdi.uoc.edu > > Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia > Av Carl Friedrich Gauss 5, B3 Building > 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona). Catalonia. Spain > > [image: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya] > > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > -- Chang Tengfei, Pre-Postdoctoral Research Engineer, Inria
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
