That sounds great to me, and it is sufficiently flexible to be useful in many 
situations.

Best regards,
Fabrice


> Le 20 juil. 2017 à 05:19, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen <[email protected]> a 
> écrit :
> 
> Hi Yatch,
> 
> here an example,
> 
> assume we have a fancy SF (named SFz) that requires to configure certain 
> timeouts in a certain manner. Consider that this configuration cannot be 
> deployed statically or pre-shared as it may depend on the app requirements, 
> node rank or can be varying in time. 
> 
> When a node in that network starts, joins through minimal and 
> minimal-security and the SFz needs to start allocating cells, before however, 
> it needs to configure the timeouts to meet the application requirements in 
> that node.  
> 
> Using the SIGNAL command with an IE that is defined by the SFz document, two 
> nodes will be able to install the configuration.
> 
> In detail, node A is time source of Node B. Assume Node B joins and the SFz 
> sends a SIGNAL command to Node A with the timeout configuration for the link. 
> Node B verifies the content of the received SFz IE in the SIGNAL command and 
> sends back a Response confirming the configuration. If all worked both nodes 
> install the configuration.
> 
> do you think makes sense?
> regards,
> Xavi 
> 
> 
> 2017-07-19 22:30 GMT+02:00 Yasuyuki Tanaka <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> Xavi,
> 
> That sounds interesting.
> 
> Could you share any example what kind of configuration will be conveyed in a 
> Signal Request and/or Response?
> 
> Best,
> Yatch
> 
> On 2017/07/19 19:22, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I would like to propose a new command to be used to the 6P Protocol. The 
> command may be used to configure SF or exchange information between the SF of 
> the communicating nodes. The command can be named SIGNAL and 6P will not 
> define the content but only the operation and encapsulation. The content will 
> be defined by the different SFs as an IE.
> 
> I think that a message like this brings flexibility to SFs to implement 
> configuration operations.
> 
> what do you think?
> regards,
> Xavi
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Xavier Vilajosana
> Wireless Networks Lab
> /Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3)
> Professor/
> (+34) 646 633 681 <tel:%28%2B34%29%20646%20633%20681>
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> http://xvilajosana.org <http://xvilajosana.org/>
> http://wine.rdi.uoc.edu <http://wine.rdi.uoc.edu/>
> Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia
> Av Carl Friedrich Gauss 5, B3 Building
> 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona). Catalonia. Spain
> 
> Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Xavier Vilajosana
> Wireless Networks Lab
> Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3)
> Professor
> (+34) 646 633 681
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://xvilajosana.org <http://xvilajosana.org/>
> http://wine.rdi.uoc.edu <http://wine.rdi.uoc.edu/>
> Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia 
> Av Carl Friedrich Gauss 5, B3 Building
> 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona). Catalonia. Spain
>   
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to