Mališa Vučinić <[email protected]> wrote: > So should we stick to AF4x or switch to a lower value?
I think that it's arbitrary.
> On 5 Dec 2017, at 02:05, Michael Richardson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> - Any particular reason why you chose class 100 i.e. (AF43 and
> AF42)
> and not any other class from RFC2597?
> I believed at the time that AF1x would have priority over AF2x,
> etc.
> but that's not the correct.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
