Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Or we could rename key_usage to key_usage_and_algorithm and split it so
    > that (key_usage_and_algorithm & 0x1f) is the actual key_usage, and
    > (key_usage_and_algorithm >> 5) is the algorithm id, which would still
    > encode key_usage_and_algorithm as one octect for first few algorithms.

Or, if the value is a CBOR array, then it's [key_usage, algorithm] rather
than key_usage.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to