Dear WGLC reviewers, working group, We submitted a new version of minimal security incorporating the resolution of most of the issues raised during WGLC. There are two remaining issues that still need to be resolved, and I hope to publish these in an additional version after the draft submission cutoff period has passed.
I will discuss the resolutions during the Bangkok meeting but please go ahead an take a look, and let me know if you are happy or not with the resolutions. List of issues with referenced changesets is available at: https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security/issues?responsible=malishav Mališa On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 8:03 AM <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e > WG of the IETF. > > Title : Minimal Security Framework for 6TiSCH > Authors : Malisa Vucinic > Jonathan Simon > Kris Pister > Michael Richardson > Filename : draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-07.txt > Pages : 45 > Date : 2018-10-22 > > Abstract: > This document describes the minimal framework required for a new > device, called "pledge", to securely join a 6TiSCH (IPv6 over the > TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e) network. The framework requires that > the pledge and the JRC (join registrar/coordinator, a central > entity), share a symmetric key. How this key is provisioned is out > of scope of this document. Through a single CoAP (Constrained > Application Protocol) request-response exchange secured by OSCORE > (Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments), the pledge > requests admission into the network and the JRC configures it with > link-layer keying material and other parameters. The JRC may at any > time update the parameters through another request-response exchange > secured by OSCORE. This specification defines the Constrained Join > Protocol and its CBOR (Concise Binary Object Representation) data > structures and configures the rest of the 6TiSCH communication stack > for this join process to occur in a secure manner. Additional > security mechanisms may be added on top of this minimal framework. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-07 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-07 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-07 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch >
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list 6tisch@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch