Dear WGLC reviewers, working group,

We submitted a new version of minimal security incorporating the resolution
of most of the issues raised during WGLC. There are two remaining issues
that still need to be resolved, and I hope to publish these in an
additional version after the draft submission cutoff period has passed.

I will discuss the resolutions during the Bangkok meeting but please go
ahead an take a look, and let me know if you are happy or not with the
resolutions.

List of issues with referenced changesets is available at:
https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security/issues?responsible=malishav

Mališa

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 8:03 AM <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e
> WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Minimal Security Framework for 6TiSCH
>         Authors         : Malisa Vucinic
>                           Jonathan Simon
>                           Kris Pister
>                           Michael Richardson
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-07.txt
>         Pages           : 45
>         Date            : 2018-10-22
>
> Abstract:
>    This document describes the minimal framework required for a new
>    device, called "pledge", to securely join a 6TiSCH (IPv6 over the
>    TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e) network.  The framework requires that
>    the pledge and the JRC (join registrar/coordinator, a central
>    entity), share a symmetric key.  How this key is provisioned is out
>    of scope of this document.  Through a single CoAP (Constrained
>    Application Protocol) request-response exchange secured by OSCORE
>    (Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments), the pledge
>    requests admission into the network and the JRC configures it with
>    link-layer keying material and other parameters.  The JRC may at any
>    time update the parameters through another request-response exchange
>    secured by OSCORE.  This specification defines the Constrained Join
>    Protocol and its CBOR (Concise Binary Object Representation) data
>    structures and configures the rest of the 6TiSCH communication stack
>    for this join process to occur in a secure manner.  Additional
>    security mechanisms may be added on top of this minimal framework.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-07
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-07
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-07
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> 6tisch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to