Yoav Nir <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Not really. You’ve added an explanation of why it’s hard to encrypt.
    > That is not needed IMO. What is needed is a statement that sending in
    > the clear (not the default in IETF protocols these days) is OK because
    > the data is not sensitive.

No, I'm saying that it's architecturally impossible to encrypt.
It's not a choice.
Anything you plan to put into the beacon has to take this into account.

I take your point about explaining why the contents are not sensitive though.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to