Hello Michael I agree with the format you selected, things are readable this way. There are 2 or 3 typos in the new text that can be fixed with the editor. Also I’m happy with the conclusions you made on the possible attacks.
All the best, Pascal > Le 22 janv. 2020 à 23:21, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-08&url2=draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-09 > > I have interspersed the security issues with each of the fields within the > description of the fields in section 2. This avoids enumerating the fields a > second time, and is probably more in the face for implementers. > This also makes it easier to review and avoids repeating what each field is. > > On the other hand, it may a poor way to present this. > > I am asking for the WG's opinion on whether to do it this way, or move it all > to the Security Considerations section. > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ > ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails > [ > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
