Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote: >> I can't help if Murray is pining for Bacon.
> I'll start a separate document.
>> Same section: "The exact process is a subject of significant research
>> > work." Are we documenting a process we don't understand? Are any >
>> references to said research appropriate here?
>>
>> There are aspects of this, and aspects that are certain. How to
>> tune/calculate the values is the subject of research. How to intepret
>> them is clear.
>>
> Could some variation of those three sentences appear in the document as
> clarifying text?
I'm going to let this conversation happen in the thread that is here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/1x8vWueTsj1l8g5UNzhEkXJSn_U
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
