> Well, that's not yet any form of gc - just an smooth data moving > from one volume to another - also good if you intend to take some > disk offline in near future, w/o serious interruption. > (The deprecated volume get emptier and emptier, and no new > data is added.)
in the original venti paper, the problems associated with disk management, redundancy and backup were ignored so they could be handled seperately. i think this is good design. but i can't take credit for this opinion. i've had kernighan & plauger, elements of programming style on my desk for a few days. this is a book old enough to give examples in pl/1 but i think it still gives advice which bears repeating. one of the suggestions is that each function should hide something important. it makes sense for the storage managment function to present an idealized block device while hiding details like disk replacement and redundency. now, if i could get all my own functions to live up to this standard.... - erik
