> this slashdot article almost asks for cpu > functionality for plan 9 by name. > > http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/08/06/29/1417247.shtml > > not a single mention of plan 9. i hope > this is an indication that slashdot has > slipped. > > screens? 1978 called and wants its > terminal server mentality back. > > - erik
cpu is not persistent, at least not in the way he wants it. John
