What can we expect an OctoVX32 distribution? ;)
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Octopus sessions persist by definition as long as you do not
> reboot your central PC. All other machines are used to run viewers, but
> the layout is preserved by the (window) file system kept at the PC.
>
> Also, you may use tar to capture (most of) the window system state
> and restore it later (eg., upon reboots).
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:24 AM, underspecified
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is actually something I am very interested in as well.
>> If a persistent version of Acme (-SAC) was available it would
>> completely obviate my use of screen.
>> Would something like this be feasible outside of Octopus as well?
>>
>> --underspecified
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Tim Wiess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> this slashdot article almost asks for cpu
>>>>> functionality for plan 9 by name.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/08/06/29/1417247.shtml
>>>>>
>>>>> not a single mention of plan 9. i hope
>>>>> this is an indication that slashdot has
>>>>> slipped.
>>>>>
>>>>> screens? 1978 called and wants its
>>>>> terminal server mentality back.
>>>>>
>>>>> - erik
>>>>
>>>> cpu is not persistent, at least not in the way
>>>> he wants it.
>>>
>>> Yeah, seems like the poster is more interested in something similar to
>>> what Octopus give you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
