>The third is to use consolefs, as Charles suggested,
>to moderate access to /srv/fscons.  This has many
>benefits over the previous two ideas: the set of console
>users is defined in one easy place (the consolefs config),
>consolefs will multiplex output to multiple connections
>(unlike /srv/fscons, which is just a pipe and thus doesn't
>work so well with multiple readers), you can log the
>console output easily, and you can see what commands
>others are executing.

Now that's the ticket!  consolefs it is!

Thanks all for the responses!

-Ben

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to