CINT has nothing to do with cin. There is a good paper on cin in the 9th Edition docs.
It went on to become vice, which has an X interface, or samuel, which has a sam interface. CINT looks pretty sucky. brucee On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Iruata Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Michaelian Ennis > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Bruce Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I don't know how you get the source but it is a cool program. >>> >>> It can simulate itself simulating itself simulating another program. >>> Lotsa cool stuff. >>> >>> http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=107172.107190&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE >> >> I couldn't find the source to CIN but I did find cint. >> >> http://root.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/ROOT/CINT >> >> It complied and ran on my mac no problem. My examination of it was >> cursory though. >> > > I used CINT only together with ROOT and personally felt using C++ as a > interpreted language a little weird; no technical remarks here, only > personal ones, tho. > > Anyway, as far as I could tell, people I know who work with ROOT on a > more daily basis write the programs as usually they do with C++ the > only difference being that they aren't compiled. They don't seem to > use the interpreter as much as programmers from other languages > considered as interpreted do. > > iru > >
