Thanks heaps for your responses. Plan 9 it is then. Expect a lot of really irritating questions over the next few weeks. :)
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Brian L. Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think a more precise way of saying it is that in 9p2000 and >> the new styx, authentication has been moved outside the >> protocol proper. styx==9p now; the names are used by >> convention to imply the auth method, if any. > > You're right. I stand corrected. For some reason I > had thought that the Tauth message was different, > but I see that in both man pages it just carries > the afid obtained by an exchange not specified by > the protocol. > > BLS > > > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ: 335082155 | Note: Due to Google's privacy policy <http://tinyurl.com/5xbtl> and the United States' policy on electronic surveillance <http://tinyurl.com/muuyl>, please do not IM/e-mail me anything you wish to remain secret.
