On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Tod Beardsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Thanks heaps for your responses. Plan 9 it is then. Expect a lot of > really irritating questions over the next few weeks. :) > Often times, googling to find the answer to irritating questions can keep repetitive traffic down... however then we'd just bitch and moan about linux, the fact that no one contributes anything, or doesn't share source for stuff... so why not just ask the questions again? This list is good on the re-runs of everything else :-) Dave > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Brian L. Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> I think a more precise way of saying it is that in 9p2000 and > >> the new styx, authentication has been moved outside the > >> protocol proper. styx==9p now; the names are used by > >> convention to imply the auth method, if any. > > > > You're right. I stand corrected. For some reason I > > had thought that the Tauth message was different, > > but I see that in both man pages it just carries > > the afid obtained by an exchange not specified by > > the protocol. > > > > BLS > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ: 335082155 | Note: Due to Google's > privacy policy <http://tinyurl.com/5xbtl> and the United States' > policy on electronic surveillance <http://tinyurl.com/muuyl>, > please do not IM/e-mail me anything you wish to remain secret. > >
