On Dec 24, 2008, at 5:36 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
EricVH's /srv replacement. See
http://graverobbers.blogspot.com/2008/12/srv-next-generation-service-registry.html
perhaps i don't understand the srv² proposal, to which there
are many parts, but part of the problem seems to be finding
a service. generally this is mediated by /net/cs. i wonder if
thinking of it that way might help?
I was very curious about srv^2 as well, but Eric's blog post is really
too terse for me to appreciate even the general directions of his
proposal.
I guess if Eric can be, somehow, motivated to discuss it in greater
details that would seem to benefit at least two (three?) members
of this group.
Thanks,
Roman.
