On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2008, at 5:36 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> I was very curious about srv^2 as well, but Eric's blog post is really
> too terse for me to appreciate even the general directions of his
> proposal.
>
> I guess if Eric can be, somehow, motivated to discuss it in greater
> details that would seem to benefit at least two (three?) members
> of this group.
>
What's in the blog post is all I'm prepared to talk about at this
time. The idea is still very high level, I'm going to need some
implementation time before I work out many of the details. When I do,
I'll update the blog.
-eric
