>>> And finally, I'd say having these exceptions is a mistake. Unless, >>> there's a really good reason, they break the paradigm of RFNOMNT >>> quite needlessly without even a hint of a benefit. >> >> so, it's likely that RFNOMNT was added and to avoid >> breaking too many things, a few exceptions were added >> with the intention of fixing and removing them. > > i don't see why that's likely. > maybe those were simply judged to be the safe set of devices.
for my part, i don't see why one would make it impossible to restrict those devices. (#| excepted, of course.) - erik
