On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 17:57 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote: > > And finally, I'd say having these exceptions is a mistake. Unless, > > there's a really good reason, they break the paradigm of RFNOMNT > > quite needlessly without even a hint of a benefit. > > so, it's likely that RFNOMNT was added and to avoid > breaking too many things, a few exceptions were added > with the intention of fixing and removing them. > > why don't you submit a patch to rfork(2)?
You mean the man page, or the system call? ;-) Thanks, Roman.
