On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 15:40, Roman V. Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: > You told me to check the archives ;-)
So I did. Maybe our definitions of 'pissing contest' differ. > And you lied too. I did? > How adorable. I aim to please and entertain. > Now, if you have something constructive to say, please say it. > If the only reason you came here is to get the kids off your > lawn -- just beat it old man. Eris has more sense in what she > posts here. Old man? I don't think I resemble that remark. It seems we've gotten off on the wrong foot. Communication can be tricky through email. There's no sense in hurling insults at me. I don't think I did anything to deserve that. By no means do I feel that anyone is 'unworthy' of using Plan 9 or gaining 'wisdom' from it. I try to encourage any and all interested in using, developing, and taking away lessons from it, to do so. I am of the mind that code speaks louder than endless pontification, and that reading the source and list archives can answer a lot of questions. In the case of Plan 9, reading the source is also a joy because it's easy to follow. Is that constructive enough for you? -- Christopher Nielsen "They who can give up essential liberty for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
