Roman V Shaposhnik schrieb: > Not implying anything, just a question: what made you pick GPL in the > first place?
Thanks to everyone for sharing their views on the licensing issue. Quite a few statements and arguments to think about... Choosing an appropriate license for a project is even trickier than I thought. So I started from scratch again: I consider J9P to be a framework for developers; "end-users" have no need for such thing. As a "normal" developer you might risk a look at the framework sources, but your main focus is to use the libraries (APIs) and technical design of the framework to create your own killer application. I published the framework not because I was looking for developers to join the project (although everybody is welcome), but for developers to use the framework to realize their own ideas. It's fine with me if these developers distribute their own work under other OSI certified licenses or even commercially as long as the underlying framework is kept open-source. If you modify the framework, you must publish that modifications, but not your own work that is based on the framework. I think that is fair enough for everyone. So I had a look at a few of the mentioned licenses, and finally ended up with what I had considered before publishing the project - LGPL. I think this is a good compromise between a very strict GPL and a somewhat relaxed BSD. The next build will include the changed license references. Regards, Bernd. -- gpg fp: F722 2826 40C2 B3C4 E136 6DE5 1DC0 7A20 513B C8F4
