On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 09:27 +0100, Robert Raschke wrote: > Last time I tried, the standard Lua compiled out of the box under the > APE.
That is good to know. Still, I'd rather see it run without APE. > Great little language. I use it in my day job (together with Erlang). *together* with Erlang?!?! That I have to know more about. Perhaps off-list. > It's implementation is indeed just as enlightening as the Plan 9 > code. An exercise in doing exactly what is required and no more. Very > elegant in my eyes. Couldn't agree more! Thanks, Roman.
