If the language can't be explained in 50 pages, it's no good.
On Sep 3, 2009, at 5:01 AM, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 04:24:50AM -0700, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
i think by now most of us expect new ornamentation added to C++
periodically. it is surprising that this is being considered
seriously
for C.
I'd like to say that my distate for C++ is purely technical, but to be
honest, I'm not quite sure.
I have the principle that, since a programming language aims to
express
clearly what you want to be done, if the author doesn't explane
clearly
his language, there is a problem.
K&R is beautiful in this respect. In contrast, I never managed to
bite in Stroustrup's description.
But the whole story is that, during my childhood, there was the
Muppet's. And a character was a swedish cook, whose name was almost
impossible to pronounce, whose recipes were not understandable, and
whose results were not engaging.
And I fear that, behind the conscious, this has played a role...
--
Thierry Laronde (Alceste) <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
http://www.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
