> If you view these tools as primarily programs that act on files
> listed on the command line, then you would prefer some of the
> proposals for change that have been made.  If you view these tools
> as primarily filters to be connected by pipes, then the command
> line arguments are just conveniences so as not to type < and > as
> often.  Then you prefer the tools as they have been.

I don't want to extend further a discussion which is clearly
already past its ``sell by'' date, but didn't you mean the
other way around?  The inconsistencies in current UNIX/p9
seem to cater to simple interactive use at the expense
both of scripts and of more complex interactive use.
-- 
John Stalker
School of Mathematics
Trinity College Dublin
tel +353 1 896 1983
fax +353 1 896 2282

Reply via email to