On Aug 10, 2010, at 6:45 AM, erik quanstrom wrote: > why don't you just preprocess the included > files. ugly, but probablly effective.
pre-processing seems to be the way to go. Good there there's mk to help set up repeatable processes.
On Aug 10, 2010, at 6:45 AM, erik quanstrom wrote: > why don't you just preprocess the included > files. ugly, but probablly effective.
pre-processing seems to be the way to go. Good there there's mk to help set up repeatable processes.