I remember his giving a talk about 5 years ago at the time of his

retirement from Bell Labs. He was delighted that he was now  a

contract employee and no longer had to fill out a

certain form annually and answer a question something like:

"What have you done for Bell Labs this year?"

Free at last.

-Tom West


On Oct 13, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Nick LaForge wrote:

>> It is so sad that the people most responsible for the key software
>> technologies are almost unheard of by the general public, and most
>> credit seems to be given to people that jump on the bandwagon much
>> later..
> 
>> If there was a Nobel prize for software, dmr would have been one of
>> the top on my list.
> 
> The public's traditional fascination with physics makes an interesting
> comparison, considering the relative obscurity computer science
> enjoys.
> 
> Physics' gifts include nuclear fission, medical imaging, aerospace,
> semiconducting... the list is enumerable. Yet the greatest celebrity
> among physicists undoubtedly is Albert Einstein, who's contributions
> are most significant theoretically (aerospace aside).  So it seems
> fitting that a similarly theoretical and precise discipline like
> computer science should enjoy comparable status (in opposition to the
> actual situation where Gates and Jobs get the glory).  Ironically, the
> real reason for mathematics omission by Nobel likely was that Alfred
> Nobel thought it TOO theoretical a discipline (see
> http://mathforum.org/social/articles/ross.html).  Regardless, it took
> people like dmr (and Turing, Church, Shannon, Neumann, Dijkstra,
> Backus, Forsythe, Floyd, Hoare, Knuth, ...) to map abstract
> mathematical science onto workable machines.
> 
> Maybe such a collaborative science doesn't permit hero worship?  Dmr's
> own publicly visible accomplishments alone make him worthy of it, yet
> his humility was so apparent ("I'm not a person who particularly had
> heros when growing up").  Perhaps his behind-the-scenes impact among
> his colleagues at Bell Labs eclipse even what everyone else can see.
> 
> But it's still sad that among those acquainted with Einstein and his
> contributions, less than 1% seem to even know who Turing was.
> 
> Nick
> 


Reply via email to