Mark V. Shaney, is that you? On Mar 19, 2012 3:54 PM, "Christoph Paschke" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> and last i checked government or meta-government support > Ok, I do another example and maybe I'm a stupid German and I have lost the > "just for fun" idea. > > I see that more and more people get already VERY (and announcement is on > VERY!) angry about all this chaos around. > I give you an example that can understand. If the electric socket would be > invented today, what you believe how much of this electric plug typs would > exist. I compare it with CARD-Readers. 100:1 ??? Yes sure, we would have > 100:1 electric plugs today if they would have been invented today. > > You not understand that people get > > ANGRY ABOUT THAT MEGA-SHIT???? > > This is only one example. There are still more like electric loading of > mobile phones and inkjet cartridges in 1000 variants. Do you really think > people here in Europe find such things FUNNY? THEY HATE ALREADY WITHOUT > END. They not want this 1000 + 1 shit anymore. > > What is Mini-X? It's already like: I LIKE THE MINIMUM TO WORK, JUST TO > WORK AND NOTHING ELSE. > > Here some company chiefs already saying: We get back to engrave our > e-Mails in stone if this goes forward such way. > > This is for you not understandable that people already get crazy at this > endless chaos??? > > So, Prof. Tanenbaum is going to win here in Europe because this global > chaos becoming endless, unbelievable, intolerable. > > So, is such a demand for a more unique system in Europe idiotic? > > HOW ELECTRIC SOCKETS where made, from chaos brothers where each one only > think of their own interests and ways of earning money? I not know, but > maybe in NOT EU countries they like this chaos. Here, already people tired > from that chaos and therefore Minix have a very good chance together with > governmental support. > > I not against Plan 9, I only want to explain here why a German as an EU > member not so far from sympathize with the Netherland concept of Prof. > Tanenbaum. And this is what he already says since years: This modern > systems are not to get handled anymore: to complex, cannot be overseen > anymore. As I remember he already gave a price in former time for somebody > who can explain him the Windows XP-system.Nobody tried it, because CAN NOT! > At the current state his statement seams to be true, that NOBODY AT THE > WHOLE WORLD IS ABLE to explain the XP-system at whole. So, if someone here > think he can explain him, do so. It's not difficult to come in contact with > him at minix3.org. I think he is until today waiting for somebody who can > tell him. > > So, you understand what might be the background for the interest in MINI-X > here in Europe? > > And at the moment, I would say, the chances are high, that this will work. > The companies have all the same problem: Unbelievable chaos in IT > everywhere that they already get crazy on. It is not only lobbyism that > stands behind Mini-X, it's some more interests in stability, > understandability etc. that got lost in the other operating systems in the > last decade. > > Am 19. März 2012 um 17:30 schrieb erik quanstrom <[email protected]>: > > > If your choice on Minix is because it is backed by E.U., you should > > question how long E.U. will last... > > silly me, i choose operating systems based on technical merit. > and last i checked government or meta-government support > is not an indicator of technical merit in solving my problems. > > - erik > >
