On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > A lack of expectation. I.e. I expect 'sam foo' to, well, edit 'foo'. 'acme > foo' does that, as does 'ed foo.' From a UI perspective, the 'sam foo' > behaviour is as non-intuitive as it gets. > > If 'sam foo' (i.e. with a single filename argument) loaded the file into the > edit window, it would mimic the behaviour of almost every other editor out > there.
Are you complaining that 'sam foo' pops up a sam window and you have to click to place the new window for foo instead of having the window automatically placed? Otherwise, I don't know what you're talking about. sam foo starts a copy of sam editing foo. Russ
