>> Replacing _MALLOCZ back with mallocz within APE realm seems to me a >> better option to consider. > > I don't think this is better. APE generally tries very hard to be compliant > to the spirit of ANSI (or POSIX with _POSIX_EXTENSION defined), this > includes not poluting the namespace with plan9isms where possible. > > Having said this what about setmalloctag() getcallerpc(), etc etc.
It is internal to the libraries and is not exposed to the APE apps, right?
