Hi!

So "piclone sdU0.0" would be right? I have the script in
/usr/glenda/home does that matter?

Yours Sincerely,
Mats


2014-11-26 18:41 GMT+01:00, Dante <subscripti...@posteo.eu>:
> Hi Mats,
>
> Look in the /dev directory (ls /dev).
> If you only have the boot device and an additional USB drive (in your
> case, an USB-to-SD adapter),
> the boot device shall be /dev/sdM0 and
> the USB/SD device shall be /dev/sdU0.0
>
> Kind Regards,
> Dante
>
> On 26.11.2014 18:16, Mats Olsson wrote:
>> Hi dante!
>>
>> I copied your piclone script in Plan 9 but even though I've been
>> digging I can't find out how to get the name of the SD card attached
>> to the pi on which I want to clone my setup on. So, easily put, what
>> command do I use to get to know that? So I wonder how to get the
>> device name of the clean SD in the USB card adapter. In your post
>> first mentioning the script you wrote: "If the device is recognized as
>> "sdUXX", call "piclone sdUXX". Well that is what I want to find out.
>> If I get that I'm ready to "rock and roll".
>>
>> Kind Greetings,
>> Mats
>>
>> 2014-11-18 23:09 GMT+01:00, dante <subscripti...@posteo.eu>:
>>> Hi Mats,
>>>
>>> I posted it before; unfortunately the archive doesn't save the
>>> attached
>>> files.
>>> Here is the original post: http://9fans.net/archive/2014/08/78.
>>>
>>> Please see the attachment for the script.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dante
>>>
>>> On 18.11.2014 22:28, Mats Olsson wrote:
>>>> Hi dante!
>>>>
>>>> I would appreciate it a lot if you could send the "clone script" that
>>>> you used to clone the 9pi imate to a larger SD card. Thanks
>>>> beforehand!
>>>>
>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>> Mats
>>>>
>>>> 2014-11-18 21:29 GMT+01:00, Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com>:
>>>>>> If you must use a rpi, you should strive to use it as a terminal,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> like every other Plan 9 terminal it should use the central file
>>>>>> server
>>>>>> without local storage.
>>>>>
>>>>> That would be my advice too.  As an experiment, I set up a 9picpu
>>>>> using
>>>>> the SD card as local storage, working mostly as a secondary smtp and
>>>>> imap
>>>>> server.  After a bit less than a year, the SD card suffered a
>>>>> catastrophic
>>>>> failure.  When I say catastrophic, I mean I can't find any
>>>>> meaningful
>>>>> data
>>>>> anywhere in the first 120MB or so of /dev/sdM0/data ... just
>>>>> not-quite-random
>>>>> looking garbage.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't think of any software fault that could wipe out so much of a
>>>>> disk, with no respect for partition boundaries (the dos partition in
>>>>> the first 64MB had not been mounted).  But I also know too little
>>>>> about
>>>>> the internals of SD cards to understand how they fail.  Maybe some
>>>>> internal logical-to-physical block mapping table went bad?
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, it's just one anecdotal data point, but I wouldn't be happy
>>>>> running any plan 9 machine with an SD card as the main filesystem.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>

Reply via email to