> On Sep 2, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Bakul Shah <ba...@bitblocks.com> wrote:
> 
> Separately, an interesting project would be to implement plan9
> sandboxes (ala linux "containers" or freebsd "jails)" so that
> one can easily set up a cluster of plan9 boxes.

Namespaces would make that an easy application, no?  There is no required 
user/kernel interface in 9P, so why not?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to