On 3 March 2018 at 20:27, Francisco J Ballesteros <n...@lsub.org> wrote: > Octopus would run on Plan 9, although we used inferno for (hosted) terminals, > and it used Op as the protocol (a descendant of 9p like everyone else),
Ok. So does anybody use octopus these days? Why not? (Who wouldn't like a ubiquitous environment?) What do the authors of octopus use instead these days? (Clive seems to me to serve a completely different purpose.) It seems the octopus environment uses a tile-like management of its windows, unlike rio, where windows can overlap. Has anybody done any experiments to arrive at a rio-like feel? How is it with the need for inferno? (I tried to install octopus now on 9front. Unfortunately it asks me too many questions I am, at this moment, unable to answer---I do not understand them.) Thanks Ruda
