i meant without having to resort to some soft fp. On 10/11/18, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> through the kernel. Not so much for the speed aspect, but to free >> up CPU cycles that can be devoted to actual SDR work. > > those 2x25kHz channels would hardly need many cycles. rather it's just > a matter of selecting the right CPU that can actually do the FFT with > some software floating point implementation :) > > i don't see memory bandwidth or even random memory access latency > affecting this scenario in the slightest. >
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Bakul Shah
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Ori Bernstein
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Giacomo Tesio
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) hiro
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Kurt H Maier
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) hiro
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) hiro
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) hiro
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Skip Tavakkolian
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Skip Tavakkolian
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) hiro
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Ethan Gardener
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) hiro