Is anyone here still running 9atom?  (Or is 9front the only variant anyone uses 
anymore?)

With some work I got 9atom installed from the USB image into a VMware VM, using 
the 9paed kernel.  However, I ran into a few issues:

- Both the 386 PAE and amd64 kernels seem to recognize the VMware SATA 
controller, neither recognizes the virtual disk attached.  The 386 PAE kernel 
boots just fine with the disk attached as IDE.  The amd64 kernel as supplied 
doesn't have IDE disk support.  I tried to add it back in but for whatever 
reason it still doesn't work.

- Both kernels boot from the USB key just fine.  However, regardless of booted 
from disk or from USB, both seem to not idle the CPU, so VMware throws a high 
CPU use alarm for the VM.  The "stock" Plan 9 uses very little resources on 
VMware.  Does anyone know why that is, or where to look to investigate that 
behavior?

- Something is different between the delivered kernels and the sources.  At 
least for 9paed.  Doing nothing other than rebuilding the sources results in a 
kernel that panics just before the boot args prompt.

Aside from those things I'm really excited to have 9atom running in a VM, even 
if I'm really late to the party!  Unfortunately the rebuild issue means I can't 
get a CPU kernel built and booted.

As a side note, it also boots and runs fine on my X1 Carbon (Gen1), which is a 
nice machine, but sadly the TrackPoint doesn't work, only the touchpad, and I 
really hate the X1's touchpad.

Anyway, thanks all!

-Ben


------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: 
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tadc546a43ce60c91-M3c369f45378f0783521c1fb1
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Reply via email to