On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 02:04:24AM -0400, ibrahim via 9fans wrote: > > There are many companies who double license code. As the owners of such code > they are free to do this. Users can't relicense code as they please > especially not GPL licensed code.
At no point did we 'relicense' anything. We have never been in control of the license terms of Labs-provided code. The code we write, we licensed MIT. We then released both as a mixture; this is explicitly allowed under the GPL (the FSF calls MIT the "expat" license, see [1] for their declaration that it is compatible) and also under Lucent Public License Section 3 A. We comply with LPL section 3 C by providing complete revision history in a source control system; anyone may inspect it to identify the originator of any of the code. Hope this helps, khm 1 - https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#Expat ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tcf128fa955b8aafc-M24a9625c1ca2e86426c517fa Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
