sorry, i hadn't properly understood the context in which those
declarations were used. i'll look at them again with that in mind.
--- Begin Message ---
i don't understand. if it's in the portability interface,
you say what arch_vcpu_info_t is, so why not
typedef int arch_vcpu_info_t;
and be done with it. i don't see why it must be a struct
in that context.
Typedefing it to an int would be fine, except then it will
be four bytes larger in Plan9 than it is in the Xen host.
Since this is a shared data structure, bad things will happen.
I think I might be able to get them to set it to some fixed
length size and just waste some space. Its just a matter of
me getting time to create a patch and test it and submit it.
Tim Newsham
http://www.lava.net/~newsham/
--- End Message ---
