On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There are actually more 'struct' typedefs in the linux header files
> than Russ found in the .c files:
yeah, maybe I should have been less terse.
Based on past year and change of watching the infiniband mailling list
discussions, my overall belief is that something along the lines of
if you're a 386
typedef int xyz;
if you're some other arch:
typedef struct { int somestuff} xyz;
and then using that in something else, e.g. another struct or a function
prototype, is just not going to be well received. I may well be wrong,
some of the discussions get a little abstruse for me, and I ended up
blowing the email thread away.
ron
