On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> Now that he has recover more or less working, Gorka is going to take a > look at this. Burning a Xen CD for him right now. A question for you > Ron - would it be bad to prototype on the more stable Xen 2.0? I'd hate > to waste time if too much of the device channel interface is chaning for > 3.0... newsham can tell us more. But my inclination, given the spin rate of 3.0, is to go for 2.0 for proof-of-concept. After all, to get it working on 3.0, you have to first finish the port of plan 9 to 3.0 ... it's be nice to have a '#X' or something so: bind '#X' /dev/xen and then see /dev/xen/net0, /dev/xen/disk0, and so on, and then disk/fdisk /dev/xen/disk0/data > /dev/xen/disk0/ctl bind /dev/xen/net0 /net and so on. or maybe the bind would result in stuff like /dev/xennet0 /dev/xensd00 etc. ? Does this sound right or I am way off base here. ron
