On 2/6/06, Tim Wiess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't know that anyone is using the mh Mail program > > but me, but I'm happy with it. I made a few changes > > and bug fixes - http://swtch.com/Mail. The major > > drawback is that using mh commits you to one machine, > > unless you do some clever synchronization behind > > the scenes. I've been carrying my laptop around just to > > read mail, which I hadn't done in years. Anyway, I think > > that the Mail+mh was a useful experiment but is not > > a good long-term solution. > > i've always used mh for mail on unix. i like it, as it gives you > many of the same benefits to having a fs interface to your mail > that upas/fs does. > > tim >
The saner the better ? gab -- "I know no way of judging the future but by the past." Patrick Henry "You can never plan the future by the past." Edmund Burke
