which one do you think is growing faster - autoconf or gcc? or is there some symbiosis?
have a glass of wine anyway. brucee On 4/27/06, Micah Stetson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://udrepper.livejournal.com/7326.html: > > The only OSes supported in the [glibc] tree are Linux and to some > > extend Hurd. > > ... > > For my new projects the razor is even sharper. Only Linux is > > supported... > > The part I find funny is that he calls everybody who doesn't like > autoconf a "winer" (am I a winner, a whiner, or a wiener? there's a > critical letter missing here) because it makes portability "quite > easy" and then proceeds to rant about how maintaining portable code is > too heavy a load for his projects to bear. So it's too hard, but only > winners think he's doing it wrong? > > Micah >
