[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, what's so bad about editing raw HTML? It is considerably more embarrassing to publish the type of unreadable trash (only its mother could love that HTML!) produced by the average HTML editor. Take a look, sometimes.
It's not me. It's a user. This is a very common problem. I just edit html myself. But I was wondering if there was something more acceptable under plan 9 than raw html.
thanks ron
