seppuku.
On Mon May 29 23:45:44 CDT 2006, [email protected] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Well, what's so bad about editing raw HTML? It is considerably more > > embarrassing to publish the type of unreadable trash (only its mother > > could love that HTML!) produced by the average HTML editor. Take a > > look, sometimes. > > It's not me. It's a user. This is a very common problem. I just edit > html myself. But I was wondering if there was something more acceptable > under plan 9 than raw html. > > thanks > > ron
