On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:15:00PM -0600, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> Brantley Coile wrote:
> >Just make loading gcc and the library and anything else
> >that from gthe gworld gof gnu optional. So I can rush out
> >and not load it. Like the way the older gcc is now.
> >
>
> yep, You don't like it, don't use it. Simple.
>
> But I'm sick of the purity arguments.
These are not purity arguments. What you're after *can* be
implemented cleanly. There are two things I worry about however:
1. Implementors having enough time to not make shortcuts
which will render system inferior.
2. Knowing when to start bugging users to fix the code
instead of implementing yet another workaround in the system.
Your tone of voice makes me think that you don't have time
for the former and you've exhausted your patience for the
later.
Thanks,
Roman.
P.S. As a compiler engineer working for a commercial compiler
vendor I have to face #2 all the time. And let me tell you
it ain't a simple thing. However, serious developers usually
understand that fixing the code (instead of asking a vendor to
shut the compiler up) is much better long term strategy.
Unfortunately they are usually not the ones to escalate
these sort of "bugs". :-(